The most important factor when choosing to manage your personal finances effectively is time. A greater time investment will almost always result in a greater financial return.

Therefore the sooner you start to manage your finances, the greater return and financial ease you will feel in the future. Many people fail to plan ahead, which results in struggling to juggle finances at a later point in life.

Money management should focus on four primary questions:

1.       What financial goals would you like to achieve?

2.       When can you expect to achieve them?

3.       What finances do you currently have?

4.       What level of risk would you make to achieve these targets?

Choosing somewhere to live is an essential in everybody’s lives, and therefore, buying a house will be the biggest financial purchase that people will make. The financial investment into a home will affect all your other finances.

Making big decisions on your lifestyle will affect your financial goals. If you consider a luxury holiday to be one of life’s essentials, you will have less money left over for savings and investments.

When do you want to retire? What expenses do you currently have? Deciding what your priorities are will help to determine what money you will have left.

It is worth assessing your current liabilities, as these expenditures and assets could be reduced or sold and free up money for the future.

Calculate how much spare money you have so that you can form an investment plan. Investments can vary dramatically. Some are high risk for higher reward or loss, and some are low risk for a steady growth on investment. It’s up to the individual to decide what level of risk you are prepared to make.

Once these considerations have been made and your plan is in places, it’s important to assess the decisions you’ve made and how they affect you on a day to day basis. You plan may be too restrictive, leaving you with not enough money to live on, or perhaps you could make greater short term sacrifices to benefit you in the long term.

A small amount of time spent on your current finances can be highly rewarding for your future.

Plans to split British bank Northen Rock in two which would allow for its partial sale has been granted by the European Union.

The divide would result in two separate banks forming and are already being described as the “good” and “bad” banks.

The “good” bank would offer new lending, retain some of the existing mortgages and hold its savers’ money.

The “bad” bank would be used to repay the existing government loans and hold the remaining loans.

 Decisions made by the EU to accept the move are seen by Northern Rock as “an important and positive step.”

Changes to the existing setup will be made towards the end of the year.

The EU revealed that the good portion of the bank would be expected to grow and then be sold to third party, with the bad bank allowing its assets to dissolve then becoming liquidated.

The good bank may be sold prior to the general election next year with potential buyers being speculated already, with Virgin and National Australia Bank, owner of Clydesdale and Yorkshire Bank, among the interested parties.

EU Competition Commissioner, Neelie Kroes, believes that the move would make the bank a good long-term option, revealing that “this decision demonstrates once again that the EU’s state aid rules provide an appropriate framework to allow state support for a sustainable restructuring of banks without giving individual banks an unfair competitive advantage.”

Whilst Jonathan Todd, European Commission spokesman, said caps would need to be applied for the duration that the good bank remains owned by the public.

Some of the caps include a balance sheet reduced to a quarter of its size prior to the crisis, not being the market leader for loan interest rates, a cap set to limit its lending to one-third of Northern Rock’s 2008 levels and also a cap on retail deposits to be slightly lower than the pre-crisis level.

An investigation was engaged by the EU into Northern Rock in April 2008, two months after its nationalisation.

The results from the investigation showed that the UK government was kept at a “necessary minimum”.

By 30 June, the bank had paid back approximately half the taxpayers’ £26.9bn loan and will gain a further £8bn from the government during the end of year restructuring.

The EU stated that the restructuring would reduce its market share to below half of its pre-crisis level and “correct the excessive expansion of Northern Rock pre-crisis.”

Northern Rock released a statement, saying “this approval is an essential requirement of the planned legal and capital restructure, which is central to the business plan for Northern Rock.”

“The restructure will strengthen the capital and liquidity position of Northern Rock significantly, and offers value for money to taxpayers” and it would be “business as usual” for its customers.

Whilst the general financial atmosphere is improving and optimism growing, it is too soon to announce that we are in the process of recovery, according to experts at Ernst and Young Item Club.

The influential professional services firm expects some growth towards the end of 2009, but this growth should begin to struggle, with 1% expected growth for 2010.

They also predicted that customers repaying debt will grow slower than first anticipated and impending tax rises will follow the election.

BT Business research predicted a more optimistic outlook, declaring that small businesses are positive about the forthcoming year.

In September, BT Business conducted a survey of over 7000 small businesses and found that 75% believed their business would see an upturn in 2010, with 61% confident about their business’ prospects.

Professor Peter Spencer, Chief Economist from the Item Club, issued a wake-up-call to all those getting carried away with the optimism of recovery.

He warned, “there could still be substantial pain to come for corporates and consumers.”

“For a sustainable recovery the UK economy needs world trade to pick up and there is still not much sign of that happening.”

One of the factors holding back growth is that the VAT rate will return to 17.5% from its current level of 15% on 1 January, a change which may see consumers making purchases before the New Year.

Several other factors which will hold back growth lie on the horizon. An increase in national insurance contributions, the new 50p tax rate, the termination of the car scrappage scheme, tighter government spending and the return of stamp duty on housing are all due to hit the country.

Judging whether the recovery is happening, on the way or unlikely is difficult to forcast.

Professor Spencer went on to tell the BBC that the recent economic data has been “very mixed,” adding, “the stock market is absolutely rampant, industrial surveys all back in positive territory, but it’s yet to show through in hard data for output and things like that.”

“And when it comes to lagging indicators like unemployment, I’m afraid it’s going to be ‘feel bad’ for quite some time to come.”

On Friday, the official statistics for the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) are released, with many expecting no economic growth at all.

GDP is a measurement of the services and goods produced in a country, and since the first quarter of 2008, the UK GDP has been in negative figures.

The Bank of England has focused on quantitative easing, an act of pushing money into the economy. Professor Spencer feels that this has been of little success, with the little improvement on bank lending, going on to complain that “instead, the banks appear to have used much of the money to rebuild reserves and improve liquidity.”

With the UK economy expected to show a downturn during 2007 and 2008, and the credit crunch still effecting the UK financial sector, many businesses are begin to wonder if their banks will be there if they need short term support.  While banks have been generally supportive of small, medium and larger businesses during the good times, the indications are that the support may well be ebbing away.

Many analysts are forecasting multi-billion pound write-offs and write-downs over the next 12 months, as the effects of the credit crunch are played out for all to see.  There is currently much activity behind the scenes, with many of the major institutions desperate to salvage what they can from some of their disasterous investments.  While we are not looking at a Barings style fiasco, it seems that many of these financial institutions may have entered into agreements which they did not fully understand – derivatives, cut and splice policy elements and large gearing seem to be the underlying problems.

Even though the world wide economy is expected to slow over the coming months, normally there would be a degree of support from banks to ensure that solid, profitable businesses are able to trade their way through any slow down.  

However, with the banks all reigning in their investments at the moment there has been a collapse in the internal money market.  While this will not last forever, and will slowly return as confidence picks up, it may leave some businesses short of additional capital in the short term.

While the announcement today that the UK Treasury will guarantee all Northern Rock customer deposits has been fairly well received - probably a case of better late than never - it does beg the question, why have the government changed their policy? Are they aware of more bad news in the sector?

Properties bought for cash

As we have mentioned on some of our earlier posts, the main component of any financial market is confidence. As we are seeing now, confidence is easy to smash but not so easy to build back up over a short space of time. The move by the Treasury today, which effectively guarantees that all Northern Rock customer deposits are safe, surprised many in the market due in the main to the historic role of the authorities not to become directly involved in free market business.

Many in the markets are asking why they performed such a major u-turn, after only hours early indicating that they were not prepared to step in above and beyond the current compensation arrangements available. Do they know something that will rock the sector again? Are they so desperate to restore confidence that this is the only action they can take?

We have regularly seen authorities in the US use such a tactic to try and soften the blow of future shocks and disappointments, but this is the first time we would have seen such action in the UK, if this is the case. No matter how hard the government try, they are not able to convince the financial markets that the worst is over. Such major changes in policy can also upset markets, with suspicion and a lack of direction being pushed to the forefront.

Historically the UK has been, and continues to be, a hot bed of new business talent with a vast number of new businesses being set up each year, some succeed, some fail and some limp along.  However, one of the main problems which many new businesses experience is under funding.  There are a great number of business people who think that they need to cut down their starting budget to a minimum in order to be successful - this is not always the case.

In order for any business to have a chance of succeeding, the business needs to be fully funded.  True, there is always a need to cut out any surplus costs but there is no way a start up business will stand any chance of succeeding unless it is allowed to grow.  Many business people have been known to approach their banks for funding with a figure which is wholly inadequate and a recipe for disaster. You need to remember that no sensible bank would expect your business to break into profit from day one, a company needs to be nurtured like a young plant - given a firm base, encouraged to grow and watered frequently, with the end product of a blooming flower (or a successful business!).

To under fund your business from day one is a major mistake and drastically reduces your already borderline chances of success.   There are many banks who would not even consider the funding of a new business if they saw that the project was under funded.  Under funding leads to :-

· Less chance of being successful.

· Tighter trading conditions.

· Less breathing space to make the normal mistakes associated with a young business.

· A disheartened owner always fire fighting.

· Probably eventual closure

As strange as it may seem it is always advisable to ask for a little more than you expect when looking to fund a new business.  There are many highs and lows of setting up a new venture, but to experience the highs and the lows, you will need to be around - for that you need to be fully funded!